[The Urban Sombrero]

I debated you about Scalia in another thread where you first tried to substitute your liberal blather for fact. If I didn't bite that time what made you think I might this time? Activist judges alter the law according to light and transient cause. Constructionist judges ala Justice Scalia resist altering the law on the same grounds. I know which camp I'm in.

Your answer here is every bit as either/or partisan as it was then. You drag "the voice of God" into areas of political thought, then demonize any opposing voice as a friend of hell, as if no room for debate can possibly exist.

At many points, you shout into the wind, and, like Don Quijote, seem to be fighting monsters of your own creation. The issue of logical come out places for judicial philosophy if rigorously applied was relevant yesterday, is relevant today, and will be relevant tomorrow. But not to you. And that suggests volumes.