[TheRealThing]

If the approach of Justice Scalia is not a suitable debate topic, and it was for him, that's on you. Personally, it seems to me that "original intent" easily becomes a way to preserve the status quo, even when that status quo involves the denial of rights that any reading of the Constitution taken in the spirit of liberty and equality under the law renders void. Again, I am not suggesting that Justice Scalia was not an amazing judge (he was), or that he was anything but brilliant (he was); I am simply pointing to what I view as limitations to his approach.

I debated you about Scalia in another thread where you first tried to substitute your liberal blather for fact. If I didn't bite that time what made you think I might this time? Activist judges alter the law according to light and transient cause. Constructionist judges ala Justice Scalia resist altering the law on the same grounds. I know which camp I'm in.