[The Urban Sombrero]

You dodge much better than you debate. My intent is to stick with established truths, not persuade the unpersuadable. And let's get real, to pursue any debate topic of your interest is not a journey to the truth. Rather such so-called debate is merely to linger in a cloud of liberal deception, which act tends to lend credibility where none is otherwise merited. Such cloud is nonetheless, one which I and others can easily see through despite your best efforts.

If the approach of Justice Scalia is not a suitable debate topic, and it was for him, that's on you. Personally, it seems to me that "original intent" easily becomes a way to preserve the status quo, even when that status quo involves the denial of rights that any reading of the Constitution taken in the spirit of liberty and equality under the law renders void. Again, I am not suggesting that Justice Scalia was not an amazing judge (he was), or that he was anything but brilliant (he was); I am simply pointing to what I view as limitations to his approach.