[The Urban Sombrero]

LOL, comes again the self-deluded to reassert a pseudo legal argument dreamed up by liberals, in order to assist in social transformation ala the vision and tactics of Barack Obama.

1) - Litigated, settled and gone as of the 1950's. But you go ahead and keep on hammering it home anyway.

2) - Reread the Scalia thread, I said about all I need to on the matter there, and have had enough of your circular ridiculousness on it.

3) - Classic example of the clinical condition from among behavioral disorders known as "Projection." PROJECTION THEORY; "The theory views this tendency as a defense mechanism whereby unenviable or unpleasant traits, impulses or ideas are attributed to another. In this way, the projector is able to avoid the unpleasantness in themselves." And as I have said, I refuse to 'help' you be sick. CODEPENDENCY; "a type of dysfunctional 'helping' relationship where one person supports or enables another person's shortfall."

In short, you're the guy on here arguing and rehashing the history of civil rights and gay marriage.

4) - Although you're obviously hoping otherwise, I will be there on that glad morning. Not because of anything I have done, but because of the finished work of The Lord Jesus. 1 John 5:13 (KJV)
13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

You ought to be celebrating salvation with me there Sombrero, not rooting otherwise. And you ought to be arguing for the cause of Christ, not couching thinly veiled opposition in the language of juris-imprudence.

Your grasp of the law is as distorted as history. Your salvation was not questioned. A reference to Barabbas and the crowd dealt with your penchant for appealing to the crowd (a logical fallacy) when it suits you.

You continue to fail to address the "if taken to its logical extreme" ethos of strict textualism championed by Justice Scalia. The issue is not some rehash of civil rights, but rather challenging a judicial philosophy with its ethos at the level of complex social issues involving equality before the law. One word of caution: many who did and do many deeds in his name and even said and say to him "Lord, Lord" actually are not on solid ground. I assure you, TRT, I put into practice his words, not without struggle and need for repentance, but with striving. However, I trust the crowd very little in defining, much less honoring, certain Constitutional principles. Thus, as you appeal to the mob, I point out Barabbas.