[The Urban Sombrero]

Oh your mind is filled with questions as I have endeavored to highlight in our discussions past. This recent question upon which you argue for all things liberal, is your particular burden of which you are by choice beset, and one which is not shared by 80% of this land's populace. I prefer Biblical references, but I enjoy the secular on occasion to be sure; “The human brain is a complex organ with the wonderful power of enabling man to find reasons for continuing to believe whatever it is that he wants to believe.” ― Voltaire

Your blather aside and putting the burden of your question into proper perspective, this thread is about the demonstrable contempt of the left for our traditionally conservative values. Such contempt being defined by judicial activism, which IMHO is nothing short of treason. The escapades of organizations such as the ACLU & ACORN and all the .orgs funded by leftist ideologues and their Congressional overlords are certainly a part, as are their propagandist outreach. And as such, how all of these would ultimately detract from the validity of the tenets of Christianity and those who espouse them. As your ever-present predilection for homosexual activism tends to confirm, it would seem you're lining up on the wrong side of the issue again.

And, so, again: Here comes plaintiff seeking relief from "colored only" water fountains, schools. Was it judicial activism, at that time, to give Constitutional remedy? You continue to ignore the FACT that the very ethos of Scalia's strict constructionist, original intent textualism makes this a relevant issue. Instead, you return to bed with your cozy partner "identity politics," even though it does not apply. Strangely enough, you keep suggesting that a show of hands is the test for Constitutional principle. One wonders, given this penchant for appealing to the crowd, if a 1st century TRT would have been in the throng screaming, "Release to us Barabbas."