[The Urban Sombrero]

The guy standing in the shadows of historical prejudice forever wanting to take the lectern. If this was 1850 your post might have been germane, but this is 2017 and the civil rights renaissance is in the books. Learn to tell the difference between your particular brand of hashed over biases and historically settled truth.

Talk about bringing up the rear, you obviously missed it and I know identity politics is all you've got, but the idea that libs think they're the only ones with a handle on decency is self delusion. The fact that liberals can't get over themselves has become self evident and is the reason why 2018 will feature another boat load of them getting voted out.

The question, O Self-Righteous One, has to do with the ethos of strict textualism, and is perhaps more relevant today than at any other point in our history. Jurisprudence has this phrase in its documents:

"Here comes the plaintiff seeking the right to marry a same sex partner..." What say the Constitution? Why, it does not speak to the matter. Well, then, it is left to the states. Wait, isn't equal protection a broad principle? Should it not extend to these consenting adults?

Now, sir, these are debateable issues, and reasonable folks may disagree, your erroneous Bible thumping, tail wagging the dog politicalization of faith notwithstanding.