[The Urban Sombrero]

Are you kidding? All you do is assume, but I got a better question. At what point do you realize how ridiculous your arguments are? Much less the analogies you dream up. Watching you copy or otherwise imitate my posts, I know that you really want to write like I do. But you need to give up on the attempts at analogy, you just don't have the gift. I mean, have you ever gone back and read some of that blather? No wonder you tend to retread your member name every so often.

Are you seriously that far gone that you cannot realize your continual defense of sin? Even if the Constitution did allow for legalized sexual depravity, (which obviously it does not) it could not insulate you from pain of judgment. Don't bother coming at me or anybody else under pretense of standing the moral high ground, you're stuck in quicksand.

That's just it: the Constitution is not the Bible, and vice versa. You've just equated the two. You are confused about the role of civil government, among many other things. If cocksureness were quarters, you could park at the meter for days. You want to live in a Christian nation. That zeal makes you dangerous, and ignorant of your own professed Savior and Lord.

By the way, to argue for a civil government that respects and honors essential liberty and freedom of conscience is not to advocate for sin. That assertion is beneath you.