[TheRealThing]

����

I am assuming that TRT believes an American is free to live as a gay person. I am assuming that TRT believes an American gay person is free to enter into a romantic relationship with another American gay person. These two people come seeking the seal of the state upon their relationship, desiring the benefits of marriage.

Now, how is it apologetics to deny these two Americans equal protection? Hiding behind Scalia's archaic notion of "original intent" (which followed to logical conclusion would leave women without the vote and African Americans as slaves UNLESS individual states chose to give remedy) doesn't cut it. At what point did asserting (falsely) that America was founded as a Christian nation become "apologetics"? At what point did referring to a President as "Pajama Boy" become "apologetics"?

Are you kidding? All you do is assume, but I got a better question. At what point do you realize how ridiculous your arguments are? Much less the analogies you dream up. Watching you copy or otherwise imitate my posts, I know that you really want to write like I do. But you need to give up on the attempts at analogy, you just don't have the gift. I mean, have you ever gone back and read some of that blather? No wonder you tend to retread your member name every so often.

Are you seriously that far gone that you cannot realize your continual defense of sin? Even if the Constitution did allow for legalized sexual depravity, (which obviously it does not) it could not insulate you from pain of judgment. Don't bother coming at me or anybody else under pretense of standing the moral high ground, you're stuck in quicksand.