[The Urban Sombrero]

🔼🔼

I am assuming that TRT believes an American is free to live as a gay person. I am assuming that TRT believes an American gay person is free to enter into a romantic relationship with another American gay person. These two people come seeking the seal of the state upon their relationship, desiring the benefits of marriage.

Now, how is it apologetics to deny these two Americans equal protection? Hiding behind Scalia's archaic notion of "original intent" (which followed to logical conclusion would leave women without the vote and African Americans as slaves UNLESS individual states chose to give remedy) doesn't cut it. At what point did asserting (falsely) that America was founded as a Christian nation become "apologetics"? At what point did referring to a President as "Pajama Boy" become "apologetics"?