[mr.fundamental]

^^ Just heard an extended interview with Ted Olson, lead council for the Bush Administration in the Florida recount of Y2K. His advice was to follow the money in the present recount situation led supposedly by Jill Stein. She has managed in the course of one week to raise 3 times the amount of money she raised for her Presidential Campaign over the course of her entire 21 month long candidacy.

Olson and Cavuto (now evidently a Trump convert) were speculating about Hillary Clinton's involvement in funneling over 6 million dollars to fund the recounts in what to date total 3 states. Call me stupid, but if the rabid chipmunks did not see a path to victory, or hopefully and more probably a path to delegitimize the Trump Presidency, she'd not be involved. Olson's opinion was to declare the recount "a folly." Stein got 1% of the vote in Wisconsin, there is nothing for her to gain. And after all, the provision for recount is in place to validate close election results, not punish the winner. In Michigan, AG Bill Schuette has blocked the recount effort arguing that Green Party candidate Jill Stein cannot seek the recount because she was not "aggrieved" to the point at which a potential miscounting of votes could have cost her the election. She garnered 1 percent of Michigan's vote.†

I mean if I were Hillary, I might try and keep my head down while so many were calling for it. Especially considering that Trump had already committed not to pursue prosecution in her case but, I don't believe these libs can help themselves.

† Associated Press Release

Again,, in the state of Kentucky there were three recounts. Are you saying each of recounts are not within someone's constitutional right?

Also, if a lib, means that people should be afforded their constitutional rights, even those I disagree with, SIGN ME UP! I would rather be a lib then an ALT RIGHT person, who dictates what my rights should be.