[TheRealThing]

God allowed choice. Consequence followed. The Constitution is not the Great White Throne judgment. To grant equal protection is not to validate. The adulterer who leaves one woman to marry another is granted equal protection. This does not validate adultery.

The four "dig points" do not offer the "open and shut case" scenario you present. Nuance matters.

Now, there may well be others who validate choices contrary to Scriptural teaching, suggesting one path is as good as another, and if a man act in his own belief that is enough, etc., but that is not the opinion I am offering.

To disagree with a person's beliefs, actions, choices but yet to defend the function of choice, of essential liberty, is not moral relativism.

Of course it is. And you can add moral activism to it as well. AFTR, I don't know if you've seen the news lately, but the only crowd trying to deny choice are those on the left. You're in there pitching as hard as you can for the losing team there ace. Just like you try to say who one votes for doesn't matter because both sides are equally culpable for things like the national scourge of abortion on demand. The city councils of Sodom and Gomorrah likely held you view with regard to politics and man made laws that back up homosexuality.

And I guarantee you this one thing, nuance won't mean squat in the endless eternity which awaits us all, and it certainly doesn't mitigate the horror and hellishness of the millions of silent screams. God heard them though. After all the revisionist duck and dodge and effort the liberal will have spent denying the impact of a man's faith in this vaporous lifespan, do you really think he will be proud at the judgment? And I know this irks you no end, but no thanks, I like my politics mixed with the reality of the truth.

Men don't need a defender in the cause of rebellion against God. That is the factor which will separate them from Him forever, you argument is pointless.