[TheRealThing]

Yes, it was an illusion.

I made two drive-bys (initially in the Jill and Hill thread) giving you two opportunities including this one, to latch on to the analogy but you missed it. Are you not familiar with the Hans Christian Anderson short story entitled "The Emperor's New Clothes?"

I said this; And so class in summation, what did we learn today? First there is no such thing as Black Islam. Second we learned that there is no such thing as essential liberty, at least in a form that can be aptly defined. It would be therefore foolhardy, to undertake building a defense of an idea which does not exist, using an interpretative tool of the law which does not exist, in order to give birth to social doctrine. Nonetheless ladies and gentlemen, I give you the liberal, whose rationales are based on the science of nothing. And who are so proud these days to expose themselves before the masses, resplendently clad in the "new clothes' of their delusion.

This was your response; "Look at the reference: "I know your game" went back to the "turn the tables" approach, which Bob uses a lot, per a quick perusal of his postings. Your inference is that I am somehow claiming Bob is an easy puzzle which I have figured out. That is not what is being said. You take a limited scope meaning and suggest it is universal. Dismissed.

Essential liberty and freedom of conscience have been defined in many ways in our discussions, and, again, for all your excessive verbal flatuence, you have settled the issue for yourself, which was not hard because you mistake sincerity and faithfulness to an OPINION for some sort of knightish defense of truth.

So, yet again you parade around the ring, arms thrown skyward, declaring yourself Head Rooster in Charge, your politics wagging your faith."




Did you per chance hear a buzzing noise going past that noggin?