[The Urban Sombrero]

What a crock. Society is what society is, population figures not withstanding. You haven't backed up a single thing you've said. And frankly, if I didn't know better I might think you're actually a girl. You can't stay focused and you routinely dodge evidence which overwhelmingly disprove your untenable liberal arguments. Take the deal with Ali's record of draft dodging. Arguing a SC case which came about subsequent to a veritable avalanche of negative reporting on the matter means nada, heck, even the justices themselves file dissentions to nearly every case. You hide behind BB's when the steely missiles of reality come crashing in every time. Thus in my view, the debater has no clothes.

Look at Clay v. United States. No dissenters.

I repeat: the four "dig points," if used objectively, only refute your contention that Deism and Enlightenment ideas did not influence our Founders.

I realize you define reality a certain way, and shape the entirety of how you filter news in that direction. It is possible to be sincere, and sincerely in error.

You equate Jefferson and Penn, then, apparently, grow frustrated when that falls flat. Your inability to see freedom of conscience and essential liberty as a dominant spirit in our Constitution boils down to "where are the exact words"?

The debater has clothes, Sir. Men's clothes.