[The Urban Sombrero]

LOL, whatever you actually do realize, I can assure you it's not contained within the body of this blather^^. But thank you for accepting my sincerity.

I don't need one single thing from the RNC in my quest to ascertain the truth of this world. 81% of evangelical Christians voted for Trump, and yet even if I'd been the only one who did, I would have been no more or less sure of my view of the truth. Pragmatic Christians understood their vote was for President, not Pastor. They therefore chose the candidate who voiced what many believed was a clear understanding and commitment to fulfill their concerns.

Now, as to your dodging reality by falsely ascribing lucidity and God's Scriptural promise of understanding given to His own, to a cultic following of Rousas John Rushdoony.

One can divide mankind into all kinds of groups, factions and beliefs. However to borrow one of your own oft used observations, God's act of sorting the net leaves us ultimately with only two categories, the saved and the lost. And as you know from reading my posts, I contend that that consideration is the prime reason God put us here. To choose for Him or choose against Him, and said choice cements our categorical placement in one of the two. Which BTW is His choice and His purview. Notice the choice was mutual, and was made possible only through His shed blood.

As I have told you in times past, Jesus says He is 'THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD'. I don't care how big a man's IQ, he cannot see truth fully until The Lord Jesus by faith through grace turns the lights of for him. Only then can he see completely the truth. Man's wisdom says that we Christian's minds, are somehow clouded by our spiritual association with The Lord and they mock us as the result. They see religion then as a mitigating factor which limits our understanding. Of course, the converse is actually true, it is the lost whose minds have been darkened, and they the ones then who fail to see the whole revelation of truth.

And so, like the scientist has come up with the complex and convoluted theory of evolution, so too has the liberal come up with a scaffold for lack of a better term, in which to support yet another complex rationalization, and I might add, one of your personal favorites. That being Christian Reconstructionism. The left sort of had to hunt a little bit to find the right controversial figure on which to pin all of this, and poor old Rousas John Rushdoony seems to have been the guy.

I, don't have any issues with my nation's history and I certainly don't need you to straighten me out on any of it until or unless you decide to stick with recorded history and eschew essential liberty and the rest of the liberal revisionist rationalizations. (all of which are unsupported in the record BTW)

You are wrong to say both Dems and Republicans do it. i.e. see riots and who protests, and who organizes and funds them.

Thank you for your brief remarks.

Have you taken the time to FOR YOURSELF take a look at the Founding Fathers? Not a few, selected ones, but rather the sum of them in toto? A few juicy quotes does not make for a comprehensive evaluation. Now, in a fundamentalist church, with a fundamentalist audience, I'm sure your effusive preening is quite well received. However, in any kind of objective forum, it's going to get pretty warm in your seat pretty quickly. In fact, in days to come, a good look at the totality of the Founders, words, beliefs, and actual lives is probably necessary to illustrate your selective use of history.