[The Urban Sombrero]

I didn't reject the source, I merely pointed out the motivating impetus for their point of view. The alleges in the story you cited still fall woefully short of any effective indictment in which you could justify your absurdly shallow claim that both sides are guilty in same food fight. They don't both do it. At any rate like your logic, your link does not work.

I said you could not name an incident and obviously you cannot. But then, I knew you couldn't and thus my confident assertion having said as much before your laughably weak attempt. Name an occasion in which the RNC used slimed tactics. I'm still waiting and you're still dodging.

What is laughable is your self- righteous blather. I suppose, to you, attempting to link HRC to "pervert" status through the misfortune of a top confidante's marriage breakup is not slime tactics.

It is almost religion the way you folks go to the "dodge" position, denying contrary information as idiot's belief.

I'm sorry, TRT, but your belief in the RNC's halo is actually what is laughable. I'm not weighing the slime on a scales and claiming "50/50" either. From Southern Baptist ol' Jesse Helms to "Hussein Obama is the antichrist" and here you are in dishonorable denial?