[Hoot Gibson]

http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2016...-campaign/

"Going ahead and calling out" is direct evidence that you have a closed, "don't bother me with evidence," mindset. You have confused your political affiliations with a Council of angels evidently.

I will state it again: politics is dirty business, and the RNC slings slime in equal proportion to the DNC.

I guess it depends on what the definitions of "slime" is. Do you consider attacking Hillary Clinton for setting up her own unsecured basement server for the illegal hosting of classified information a "sliming?" What about Trump's attacks against Hillary for the destruction of at least 33,000 documents that were under subpoena at the time she ordered them destroyed? Is that a case of sliming? What about when Trump points out that Hillary has repeatedly lied about receiving and sending classified information using her homebrew sever? Is that your idea of "sliming?" It these examples are what you define as "sliming," then you are right about Republicans sliming Hillary Clinton.

However, I believe that most rational people would see such attacks as attempts to hold a criminal accountable for her crimes and understand that there are many American citizens who have been sentenced, fined, and fired for similar crimes that they committed on a much smaller scale.

Trump is definitely not above fabricating charges against a political opponent, it was one of my biggest issues with him during the Republican primaries - but in Hillary Clinton, he is running against a deeply corrupt politician whose actions would be unbelievable if done by a Tom Clancy or Vince Flynn character. Who needs to slime a crooked opponent when the truth is so well documented and disturbing? It is often said that, "You can't make this stuff up," but in Hillary's case that is the literal truth.