[TheRealThing]

Now, before we go into it too much, are you sure you want to hold that Onesimus was a slave of Philemon in the manner of slavery as in the trade of captives that went on in this nation's past?
Or, historically, would their relationship have been much closer to indentured servitude, with Onesimus leaving before paying off what was owed with a term of service? You play semantic games.

No, I've laid out my argument and used Scripture to back it up. If you think I'm wrong, go ahead and lay out your case and seriously, please be my guest to 'go into it too much.' Onesimus was a slave, and Philemon owned him. But you have the floor now, straighten me out.

Let us hope you can do much better than you did in explaining to us the difference between requirements for the various ID Cards as opposed to why voter ID's would be some sort of disenfranchising and undue burden.