Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CNN analyst: Questions about Clinton’s health sexist
#16
TheRealThing Wrote:LOL, you the venerable Urban Sombrero want me on record huh? :please: Anything I write on this forum is on the record.

But wow, so much for anything resembling objectivity. First the illegal immigrants working for Trump. Trump writes the checks and demands the three things any well represented client would from a construction general contractor. On specification, on budget and on time. Whether it be high-rise or casino, all projects are accomplished by subcontractors who have bid with and are subservient to the general contractor. There are 16 separate architectural divisions which make up the total construction package. They are things like concrete foundations, structural steel, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, and so on.

Because of the intricacies associated with any one of those divisions, subcontractors always specialize, while the general plays the role of organizer and traffic cop, and speaks on the authority of the client and the architect. On projects as complex as are typical for a Trump enterprise, the chain of command within the General Contractor's organization would be rather complex, involving front line supervisors all the way up to the Superintendent. Therefore, the norm would be to see a fairly high number of 'subs', all working at the same time. There is no way Trump went out and hired the many thousands of workmen who may have at any one time been technically in his employ. The subs do all of their own hiring, as does the General. Their pay checks have the name of the sub in question on them, not Donald J. Trump. You're not going to convince me that he actively solicited for illegals so that he could stay on budget on any jobs that may be in question. Especially in consideration of the fact that illegals tend to be much more numerous in places like Miami.

Sorry pal, but until you're tethered a little more substantially to the same good earth upon which I walk, I'll not be taking your word for anything more than what it obviously is, liberal talking points and revisionist rationalizations. And I don't need to dig after leads, I know the truth from the talking points, mostly because I've been paying attention as history has unfolded over the course of my life. I don't run to the DNC to get them to tell me what I should think about the stuff that happens in this world. Further, I balance what I see and hear against the Scriptures. If it's La-La lunacy, I recognize it, so you can tell yourself that your side of the argument has just as much merit as the conservative side does just to make yourself feel better. You'll never convince me with the shallow and circular logic of the left.

Dost thou artfully construct? Why, yes, thou dost. Donald Trump did not give a whit whether the folk building his hotels and casinos and golf courses were legals. He couldn't have cared less. You know it. I know it. Revisionist? You have to be good at it to maneuver around all the Trumpisms. In my view, it doesn't disqualify him for being President. The stakes are high. Winning is the only thing. That's big time politics.

Nobody knows the truth from the talking points. Social media and Internet journalism have so polluted the water that the pebble of quartz truth at the bottom is nigh impossible to see. In reality, HRC could be on death's door, and DJT could have cholesterol off the charts. I doubt the average citizen would know it.

On another note, I have yet to find a candidate for President yet since such things were calculated that, on the night of election were upside down in likeability and trustability. Unless something drastic happens, no matter who wins, he or she will be a first in that regard.
Messages In This Thread
CNN analyst: Questions about Clinton’s health sexist - by The Urban Sombrero - 09-14-2016, 01:17 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)