[The Urban Sombrero]

Thanks for yet another non-sequitur. When John Calipari is paid to speak, it is generally done to provide entertainment and motivation to his audience and the speaking fees paid never approach the level commanded by the Clintons. But you already know that, don't you?

You, one who professes not to be a Clinton supporter, continue to engage in the defense of the indefensible. There need not be a conviction, with or without a trial, for there to be a merciful and just end to a political career. The time for political justice for the Clintons is long overdue. Clinton apologists, through their twisted logic in defense of political corruption, only invite the rise of even worse examples of humanity to powerful positions in this country.

What "does not follow" are folks who continually skirt around the fact that asserting things like "HRC=Charles Manson" and "Liberals=Satan" demonstrate extremist thinking. As long as a major political party has to dance with extremists in the primaries, it is going to be treacherous in general elections nationally.

What I asserted is that a face-to-face meeting often satisfies the "power jock sniffer." Of course many also want pet projects and policies to get "favored nation" status with power elites. Are the Clintons more adept at using "power jock sniffers" than most to acquire donations? That's probable. Again, if "quid pro quo" exchanges are proven, I'll shed no tears when consequences flow.