[The Urban Sombrero]

You're sliding around on me there Sombrero.

I've seen a lot of Presidential candidates come and go. Never before this year have I ever seen one who has been investigated by the FBI, and the US Congress on separate matters of epic import. In addition to that, we have an impending investigation over the Clinton Foundation and it's glaringly fishy good fortunes during the four year stint that Hillary served as the US Secretary of State. But, you think I am "tainted with extremism" while you accept anything she says. LOL yeah, I admit it. I've got this thing for the truth that I just cannot shake free of. I always pass on the liberal assault on truth.

So to answer your question again, and I'm sure you'll dodge the answer again, here goes anyway. Yes, absolutely. Voters then and now sell their vote to the highest bidder. Promises of free goodies are all she has to offer. She has no record, so there is no political science going on here. The people who're bound and determined to voter for her are in it for what they can get. I know this for two reasons; First, she says exactly that every darn day. Second, her constituency are a collaboration of SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS. Every one of them have their hands stuck out for something, Hillary has vowed to fill those hands. And since government has no money of it's own, that means the taxpayer is to be stuck yet again.

Have you looked at Ruth Bader Ginsburg lately?

Most voters pull the lever most connected to self-interest and his or her own pocketbook. I do not agree that all HRC has to offer are free goodies. I do not think she alone is a "bone thrower" to her constituents. The Great Wall of Trump? Reduced tax rates for the wealthiest? Bazookas for the private citizen? I'm simply pointing out a reality: elections are often about the promise sweepstakes.

Ginsburg has looked like that for twenty years.