[TheRealThing]

No, it is just the truth, which you and TRT would not recognize if it bit you in the ass. The only time that you respond to my posts is to exchange personal insults. That is your insecurity and ignorance letting guiding your fingers around your keyboard. You, TRT, and other know-nothing supporters of Trump have won Hillary more votes than her paid ads have. Trump is finally realizing that fact. Many of his dopey "supporters" have not.

I am voting against Hillary. You aren't.
I am not attacking Hillary's Republican opponent. You are.
Checkmate.

Throwing out ridiculous arguments that are quickly and easily shot down, then crying personal attack is another classic liberal Democrat trait you possess Hoot.

It doesn't make any difference how many people come on here to explain it jet, Hoot had a little credibility as a poster in times past. But I knew as soon as I began to challenge his campaign against Trump, he'd go nuts and others would be able to see it for themselves. I'm just trying to wrap my head around the mental trauma you must be under right now as you wrestle with the stigma of being "intellectually lazy", whatever in the heck that is. I mean, I guess Hoot is intellectually robust? nicker: But you have him exactly right, he uses the same tactics liberals do with the name calling and laying claim to the intellectual high ground, while feigning self righteous indignation when somebody sends any of it back his way.

Every vote counts. It's not a matter of rationalizing away personal responsibility because supposedly, the state in which you vote is already lost to the other side. I mean, why even have the election if it's that cut and dried? I believe the election is much closer than the polls or the pundits are putting out, and in Hoot's reaction we see how people's minds are manipulated, even a super genius like him, to garner votes which benefit the left. If people buy the propaganda, many will just stay home, some will vote for daffy duck (which is a de facto vote for Hillary) and some will actually vote for her straight up, claiming they believe she's more qualified. In fact, I believe that many people secretly want to believe she will be good to her word and give them things. The aged want to believe she'll up Social Security and medical care will be free. The lazy want to believe the gravy train will keep on a-rollin, every group has their wants and she's promised them all something. Obama did exactly the same thing and we see where such naïveté has brought us.

What ever happened to just voting for the best candidate? The tail wags the dog with all the cerebrally elite it would seem. To say you're not voting for the best candidate because you've got your nose in a snit over some backdoor logic that makes you too good to vote against somebody, Clinton in this case, is an absurd twist of reality in my book.