[WideRight05]

You got a pedigree in psychological evaluation there Wide, or are you just recognizing the sign posts of ground you've already covered? You've not added anything meaningful to any political or moral discussion, it has been an attempt on your part to make it personal. I don't feel the need to defend points that I have already spoken to and developed on so many occasions.

The fact that McCain, Paul and Romney have injected themselves into this election cycle is unprecedented in American politics during my lifetime. That's new for them and I have thence stopped defending their actions. In no way does that change the topic at hand, which is that one of two people will be moving shortly into the Oval Office. I cite credible personalities who agree with me as does any person I've ever seen whether the medium has been a speech or the written word.

The only way I will change my mind on any of this would be if and when a President Trump is judged on his actions, not the wild eyed speculation and conjecture of his political opponents. Nobody knows what he will do until he does it.

I don't know why anyone would defend the actions of McCain, Ryan, and Romney in the first place, but that matters little to me. At least I've covered the ground - I've tried who knows how many times to get you to cover the ground, and you still won't do it. Your only arguments have been trying to use Trump winning the vote of the people and/or big name Republicans that have supported him. And you say you cite credible personalities? Come on man, you tried to use Chris Christie and Sarah Palin to encourage me to support Trump. Not to mention, if I disagree with you on something you instantly try to attack my credibility instead of the topic at hand. But, that has been the typical reaction of most of Trump's base. Same as their master.