[The Urban Sombrero]

Nope. You cited Jefferson and in so doing, you suggested that he would align himself with your interpretations of the founder's intentions and against those of Seger's. I totally disagree with you on that basis.

Seger is right. The libs' secular humanistic rationales, of which you seem to be a true believer, are vastly different from Jefferson. And let's get real, Seger is also right in his assessment of your desire to change America into a vast wasteland of compromise based on 'light and transient causes.' I found it blissfully ironic that you chose to call up his reference to what Reagan would have termed "staying the course," or his advice to resist change based on social attitudes which do often morph into temporary stupidity. Jefferson understood clearly that the character of God does not change, nor does His admonitions or His law, and certainly not His coming Judgment.

In Jefferson's rendering for his devotional, anything unexplainable by human reason was edited out. I quoted Jefferson because I was asked to, and your cocksure, revisionist bs notwithstanding, the quote was chosen at random from the reader and not for any debate purpose other than to let BS know I wasn't bluffing about having read a decent amount of primary source material. You don't get to wade in, "Donnie" right in the middle of the story. "You're out of your element."