Thread Rating:
06-15-2016, 12:03 PM
zaga_fan Wrote:I think it's a bad idea because it's too much product...
BUT cash is king and if people still fill up arenas and sponsors still want to support it - there's no reason WWE shouldn't go that direction.
Pulp, let me play devil's advocate for a minute.
Right now they do one PPV a month while building story lines on one show a week. Yes, they have two shows a week, but Smackdown isn't used to build stories - it's simply a wrestling show and you can literally never watch it and not miss anything in terms of character development. All of this is to make Smackdown relevant during this brand split, something they didn't do last time around.
:devilflam You are good at that my friend.
IMO, we will see the same matches and feuds for months and months with the same outcomes & results, similar to what we see now.
They had better give SmackDown some serious talent if they want any shot of making this legit.
Check out my YouTube channel.
www.youtube.com/c/AlexGreenDifferentBreed
www.youtube.com/c/AlexGreenDifferentBreed
Messages In This Thread
WWE making more changes to the brand split - by Strikeout King - 06-14-2016, 02:30 PM
WWE making more changes to the brand split - by Pulp Fiction - 06-14-2016, 05:47 PM
WWE making more changes to the brand split - by zaga_fan - 06-15-2016, 03:57 AM
WWE making more changes to the brand split - by zaga_fan - 06-15-2016, 03:44 PM
WWE making more changes to the brand split - by plantmanky - 06-14-2016, 03:17 PM
WWE making more changes to the brand split - by Pulp Fiction - 06-15-2016, 12:03 PM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)