[TheRealThing]

^^ I posted my source, which was the Denver Post, not exactly a rag even by today's standards. The article even had a video rider attached to cue up whenever a visit was made to the page. My understanding of said article and video was on the money. Therefore, if credibility is on the line in the matter, it would be that of The Denver Post, not my own.

I suppose I could invest every waking minute of my day for the foreseeable future and dredge up a legitimate rebuff of the intense effort you have made to win a debate point with me. But fortunately, my life is quite a bit richer than that, and besting you is no more rewarding than allowing you to diminish the debate by striving to be right about some small point is entertaining. Still in all, it is odd that The Post would go to such lengths to dishonor themselves. And it is somewhat of a head scratcher to answer why if Colorado's delegates have not in recent history ever been bound, that the State GOP would feel compelled to change Party rules so that they would... still not be bound? At any rate, they are all together unfazed that there are points of view that conflict with their own.

Only 95 unbound delegates went to the convention in 2012. The chart of interest revealed that only 13 of those were from Colorado. There is quite a bit of conflicting information on the subject, however, your assertions that delegates go to the convention and vote their own conscience were not exactly on point. And the notion that unbound delegates can have a lot of impact is off too.