[Hoot Gibson]

So, let me understand this. According to you the disenfranchised voters in Colorado are protesting because the heretofore unbound Colorado delegates are still unbound? Here is what happened whether the truth matters to you or not. Voters did not get to participate in the Colorado Primary process this time around, non binding or otherwise.

Obviously with no voter preference on record with which to contend, the Colorado GOP did exactly as they pleased irrespective of the will of the http://www.bluegrassrivals.com/forum/ima....gifpeople. Which BTW, seemed to matter to said GOP who required delegates to vote for the candidate who won the caucus, that is right up until last August when the rules were changed. One more thing. What with the real truth having come out by an overzealous #NeverTrumpster, it has become obvious that even if Trump had spoken in Colorado, the likelihood is that the outcome would have been the same. See, the Republicans in Colorado decided they didn't like the idea that Colorado delegates would be bound on the first ballot, which is normally a RNC requirement.

"The GOP executive committee has voted to cancel the traditional presidential preference poll after the national party changed its rules to require a state's delegates to support the candidate... Ta Dah, are you ready, who wins the caucus vote .

The move makes Colorado the only state so far to forfeit a role in the early nomination process, according to political experts, but other caucus states are still considering how to adapt to the new rule."

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_28700919/

If you are not man enough to admit a mistake, then I will quit wasting my time on you. There was no primary in 2012 and a primary was never scheduled for 2016. Those are the facts. They are not open to debate. An RNC rule change would have forced Colorado to bind its delegates if there had been a straw poll taken at this year's GOP caucus. The state GOP wanted to send unbound delegates to the national GOP convention, as it had in 2012, so they elected to cancel the vote, which had been non-binding following the Colorado caucus in 2012. You are playing fast and loose with the facts, as is your leader, DJT. You do understand the difference in a primary election and a caucus, don't you?