[Hoot Gibson]

LOL, you don't spend much time obsessing over "factual" tweets as put out there by the Colorado GOP, and as was duly reported by the unbiased within media circles, I got that. But you certainly spend quite a lot of time obsessing over the legitimate campaign of one Donald J Trump who, in all likelihood will be the nominee.

[B]You can't cite a single example to put up here where I have posted anything that was either wrong, or that you had to correct me about.[/B] Although, I would think you've spent a considerable amount of time obsessing and fantasizing about good it would make you look if you did.

I would remind you, that in this state where you might have expected your influence on political forums to bear fruit, Trump won anyway. In any event the fact that you jumped up on an innocent man in the person of Lewandowski, proves how desperate you've become to see Trump derailed.

There was no Colorado primary election in 2012 AND I have already corrected you for making that mistake. Are you suffering from short term memory loss, or did you just not bother reading my explanation? There was a straw poll taken in 2012 at the Colorado closed caucuses. Do I also need to explain the differences between a primary election and a caucus to you? Santorum won the preference poll in 2012, but none of Colorado's delegates were bound to any candidate on the first ballot.

Again, you need to fact check your own posts better. You also need to read my responses more closely before posting responses.

You made another factual misrepresentation in your most recent post. Lewandowski was not found innocent. The prosecutor acknowledged that there was adequate probable cause for the police to charge him with simple battery but he concluded that the evidence was not strong enough for him to be confident of a conviction.

Even if Lewandowski had gone to trial and successfully defended himself, the best outcome for him would have been a "not guilty" finding by a jury. Juries do not find defendants "innocent." Their job is to determine whether evidence is adequate to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The distinction is an important one. Juries do not find defendants guilty beyond all doubt and they do not find them innocent. That is not what a jury does in this country.

BTW, I did not reply to the post where you incorrectly said that there was a Colorado Primary election in 2012 because you had complained about me responding to your posts not directed to me. I included some bold text to make it easier for you to find the correction. I also thought others might appreciate an accurate explanation of the Colorado caucuses after reading the disinformation from a Trump supporter.