[Hoot Gibson]

You really took offense at that Karl Rove remark huh? I did conflate your statements about Libertarians breaking the vote count record with rejecting the front runner if that person happens to be Donald Trump. I said you seem to be cohabiting the same corner with Rove, and I said that in a way that afforded you room for denial. I must say though, I thought you only called your staunch enemies liars. I can say however, that I've never called anyone on this site a liar and that includes you. If you weren't so blinded by ire, you'd have noticed that I took the edge off for you by asking if you agreed with me on the convention rules. I used to say that the country was likely too far gone to salvage and you used to take a more optimistic view. Now you're acting like it's over if we don't get Ted in there as President. I don't know, but I know corrupting the process won't serve us well either. These elections tend to come around every four years and we'll want things to be orderly and legal then too. You've not called for convention shenanigans, but you're okay with blocking Trump and I worry that voters will interpret that as disenfranchisement. And I worry about the fake protests which are reportedly funded by Soros.

There is no way that Democrats joining forces with Republicans to defeat the front runner for the nomination, is on the up and up.

And for purposes of your personal enlightenment cultists are normally associated with religious deviation. You seem to have gone completely around the bend with this Never Trump gig, and I don't understand it. My conversation with you has been with you. I get the impression that you feel you can sway this election somehow with what you say on here. As I have pointed out, the Kentucky caucuses are past and Trump won. The next time Kentuckians vote will be in the actual election this coming 8th day of November.

The problem from the establishment view is not merely their opposition to Trump. They hate Cruz even more and getting Trump out of the way won't help Cruz one bit, Lindsey Graham level endorsements notwithstanding. Are you seriously not worried about Cruz being up against the broom jockey? I am.

Conflating two true statements does not turn an unrelated falsehood into the truth. Am I supposed to be thankful that you "afforded me room" to refute a lie? That is not a rational expectation on your part.