Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rubo Supports a Constitutional Convention
#62
Hoot Gibson Wrote:It's not up to any administration, friendly or unfriendly. What Levin proposes is to circumvent Washington politicians entirely by calling a Convention of States. Neither the president, Congress, nor the Supreme Court would play any role in setting the agenda, drafting the amendment(s), or ratifying them. That is the point. Levin argues that we cannot trust the federal government to address the biggest problems facing this country and I agree with him.

Consider term limits, which many Americans favor, and a balanced budget amendment. The federal government will never pass amendments addressing either of these issues and send them to the states for ratification. They will promise to address these issues when they campaign, but most will not endanger their own power by taking any real action.

I will eventually get around to reading The Liberty Amendments but until then I am not taking a position on the Convention of States. I listen to Levin quite a bit and what I have explained above is based on his defense of his positions to skeptical callers.

Washington and the other founding fathers never intended for our federal government to grow as powerful and centralized as it has become. Federal politicians have treated the 10th Amendment like a joke and a Convention of States might be a valid way to reassert the power of the states, an action that Washington would surely approve.



I knew you would take my post like that. I was in a hurry and should have waited I suppose. Washington covered that base in the quote and I know you saw that. I hope you also know that it means nothing to me to get the last word, or win a debate for the sake of winning.

My position is that American government types have come to the point in time when they no longer revere the founders intent, or our national heritage as was recorded so carefully in US History. Being a student of history I can tell you that the greatest threat to any people is to forget their own origins and history. Revisionists have dismantled our history and our heritage has followed suit. Therefore, most people's knowledge of the story of this nation's birth goes no deeper than being able to sing "Yankee Doodle."

My concern is based in the change I see in everyday Americans. Polls reflect that this nation's youth are okay with just about anything including gay marriage and abortion. There are all kinds of colloquialisms for the condition, "the genie's out of the bottle," "that ship has sailed," "that train has left the station," "innocence lost'" and on and on. I saw the voter awaken and I was heartened. Then I saw members of government do their best to disenfranchise those good folks of their votes and their will. Some are okay with that because it suits their cause. Others are convinced that they know what's best for everybody else, and are more than willing to run over the voter to force whatever that may be on them, as in the case of ObamaCare. Or perhaps the nominee that Mitt Romney thinks is best for us.

I think the only safe haven we have, is to live and abide within the system set up by the founders. The system or checks and balances, the electoral process, the proud history of a lawful people. We are society of laws and we are governed by "the people." Like I said, we don't respect that anymore and the erosive side effects lie all around us. Schools can no longer truthfully educate our young, as standards have been watered down until education has become a joke. In fact, the student has become the master of late as those who have supposedly come to be educated now feel disposed to lecture everybody else. Crime is rampant, police have their hands tied behind them as do our military. We are in the midst of a debt crisis of nightmarish proportions, morality is now relative at best, many men just do not feel compelled to work, alcohol and drugs are literally everywhere including some church pantries. And we grind up babies to make cool stuff for consumers.

We are a people who despise laws. Our laws were not set forth in vague ambiguities, and newer and clearer laws will be run over with the same reckless abandon. Case in point. How clear really, does one have to say it is wrong to cut appendages off of the unborn until they are dead?

We turned our back on God, became lost and confused, and have forfeited the moral authority to govern ourselves. I had hoped that we were about to see a resurgence of personal dignity by a people who wanted to see Godly principles honored once again in America.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Messages In This Thread
Rubo Supports a Constitutional Convention - by TheRealThing - 03-07-2016, 05:41 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)