[TheRealThing]

Any amendments passed at a Convention of States and ratified as required by the Constitution would become just as valid as any other part of the Constitution, as amended through the regular amendment process. The Supreme Court does not have the power to set aside any part of the Constitution, including any of its amendments. I do not see your point. Of course, liberal activists might rule wrongly on any part of the Constitution, as they have in the past. That does not mean that as a country we should just give up on the notion of being a constitutional republic.

Maybe not but they have certainly ruled in such a way as to bring us Roe v Wade and the Repeal of DADT. If we can't enforce the law as it stands, and we don't, new laws will fare no better.