[TheRealThing]

The equation is the Constitutional principles of justice and equal protection under the law and interpreting the Constitution in such a way that " we" is not exclusionary. Now, black Americans may not like the "we" including homosexuals with equal protection, but that changes nothing. Plus, the urban Sombrero is from Seinfeld, not a claim of racial identity. Constructing my points to benefit your argument is, alas, also logical fallacy.

Well, if my argument is logically flawed you have failed to demonstrate it in any practical sense. (Liberal talking points and abstractions do not count.) Nor am I in the least concerned that you will be able to so do in the future. But to that end, there was no constructions on my side of this conversation of sorts, I only pointed out the way you presented your anti-logical rationale.