[Harry Rex Vonner]

Are you suggesting that a person who disagrees with your view of the Constitution has "no moral compass?". Would Scalia have said that of Ginsberg? Is a heterosexual woman who supports the right of same sex folks to marry under a civil government somehow a morally pathless person?

Actually, I am saying that anyone who intentionally interprets the clear intent of the US Constitution in a way obviously never intended has no acceptable moral compass.

Justice Scalia was unwavering in his deeply held belief in the sacredness of life. He, as our founding documents make perfectly clear, believed that life was a gift from God to be respected and not destroyed for the sake of convenience.

He further, as a devout Roman Catholic, believed in the sanctity of the sacrament of marriage as founded by God. This is absolute.

Yes, indeed. He was the moral compass of the USSC. And yes indeed, anyone not respecting the absolute right to life and anyone denigrating the sacrament of marriage is amoral.

You don't change the law of God to suit the whims of an amoral, decaying society.

Justice Thomas and Justice Alito are godly men. Justice Kennedy and Justice Roberts have many good Christian traits. However, no one led like Justice Scalia. Without his influence and example, the country will accelerate its pace to moral destruction.