[TheRealThing]

While we are admonished not to judge others, your tagging of Brennan as an activist liberal is correct. Eisenhower stated on a number of occasions that the worst mistakes of his life were appointing Brennan and the equally radical liberal, Earl Warren, to the USSC. He was correct. Those were two devastating mistakes.

The bottom line in these appointments is that Democrats only appoint thoroughbred activist liberals who remain true to their philosophy. Republicans often fail miserably in nominating conservatives with such dedication and passion. Kennedy and Roberts, though allegedly devout Catholics, have been serious disappointments.

Who will replace Scalia? Obama nominates. The US Senate confirms or rejects. Obama, being completely loyal to his black half and ignoring his white half, will nominate a black. Who will that black be? Three good possibilities are Eric Holder who would be near impossible to confirm and may not be young enough to serve for 25 or 30 years, Loretta Lynch who is an absolute rubber stamp for any and all liberal causes, and Cory Booker who is a senator from New Jersey and, though a good spinner of neutrality, just as liberal as the other two. Do you doubt it? Obama is the most race oriented president in history. With him, everything is racial and his dominant half is always a victim. Thus, in light of how he thinks, how can he not nominate a black?

The Republican senators need to grow a backbone and stand strong. Voters, particularly those who believe in the Second Amendment, better wake up and vote as if their right to keep and bear arms is in danger of being taken away. Because, indeed, that is the case. All Obama, Clinton, and Sanders need is one more justice. Fate ridded them of their most able opponent. The other conservatives on the Court are not leaders like Scalia. I cannot overstate the seriousness of this constitutional crisis. Don't any of you doubt it.

We seem to be had. The Supreme Court is in great jeopardy of succumbing to liberalism, that's one of the three coequal branches of the federal government. The US Congress is now in the hands of Republicans, who seem to be waiting for direction, that's two of three.

The executive, that's three seems to be the potential remedy for which everybody is waiting, but both of the Presidential campaigns are a swirling mess. A mess for which the outcome looks to have a diminishing likelihood for success. Both sides are hopelessly mired in an embarrassing foodfight. The Democrats are offering the people a choice between a doddering lunatic socialist, and an equally compromised woman, with sufficiently enough feminist and social issues so as to provide the soaps with material for the next decade.

On the Republican side, there seems to be three candidates who would govern in a fashion which does not cater to the globalist view, Cruz, Trump, and Carson. When considering the prophetic texts regarding the one man, who will be the autonomous head of the one world government, with one economy and one church, the specter of globalism should give any American chills. That is one of the main reasons why I do not favor Jeb, Kasich, or Rubio.