Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7
#9
I can understand the Lawrence County complaint. They definitely have some quality wins: a win and a loss against the #9 and #11, then a win and a loss against the #18 - all neutral court. Then also the loss to the #39, also on a neutral court. Looking at those alone, you could make the argument for top 25ish. The problem is they haven't been able to gain many points in the rest of their games, because the competition is too weak - probably no fault of their own, you just have to travel farther in sparsely populated areas to find the competition, and it's not as practical. Still, the numbers are the numbers, nothing I can do about 'em. Here is the resume in rank order of their opponent's quality.
Messages In This Thread
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by SoccerMath - 02-07-2016, 04:06 PM
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by Paparazzi - 02-08-2016, 03:41 AM
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by Wildcat man - 02-08-2016, 04:41 AM
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by Motley - 02-08-2016, 06:52 PM
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by rojas - 02-08-2016, 09:02 PM
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by Tubby Hater - 02-08-2016, 10:23 PM
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by SoccerMath - 02-09-2016, 02:25 AM
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by SoccerMath - 02-12-2016, 05:04 AM
Updated Maher Rankings 2/7 - by rojas - 02-08-2016, 12:46 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)