[LOOKAYANNER]

I could be wrong but I think there's only 3 or 4 districts in the entire state that do not seed for their tournament. Seeding is a good thing because not only do you usually get the best two teams from your district to play in the region, it also gives much more meaning to the season games between district schools. Those games almost seem like a mini - tournament type games because of their importance to the post-season tournaments. The 54th district school administrators that are voting to block seeding should reconsider.

I know it's on a completely different level and may not be a fair comparison but think what it would be like if the SEC did not seed their tournament. Last year's UK team had zero losses in the conference during the season but without seeding based on the conference record, and using a blind draw, they possibly could have been pitted against the second best team in the conference in the first round of the tournament and had to play 4 games to win it instead of 3. Without seeding team are not rewarded for a good district record during the season.
That's just my opinion for what it's worth.