[doubledown]

Hopefully, you are not serious. Even if murdering police officers was a federal offense, the President of the United States cannot change the punishment for a crime by signing an executive order and bypassing Congress. In this case, murdering local police officers is not a federal crime, so Trump would be creating legislation and the penalty for a federal crime that does not exist, all by bypassing the Constitutional process entirely. The Supreme Court would strike such an action down by a 9-0 vote and if Congress were doing its job, it would impeach any president who took such an action.

When you say we're all stupid, please do not include me. I knew what Obama was doing with Obamacare and I believe that I know what Trump is up to as well. Trump is making it difficult for a serious candidate to gather enough support to avoid a convention fight. Hillary will be the direct beneficiary of Trump's attempt to play his supporters for fools.

Hillary will not waste any money on ads attacking Trump because every time that he starts talking off the top of his head, he helps her campaign. The major networks, including FNC, are providing Trump with a fortune in free publicity and that free coverage comes at the cost of not adequately covering Hillary's crimes.

Tomorrow night's debate is going to be very interesting. I hope Trump really goes after Cruz, but I don't think Trump is a stupid man and personally attacking Cruz in a debate the way that he has personally attacked other candidates would be very stupid.

Hoot-- was being not serious but being serious on a couple of reply's.
Know your not stupid as you make some great points and commentary on this site but point was the population as a whole on the Grubber deal.
His statement being upheld as looks like Hillary a shoe-in and a great number of voters supporting a socialist? What's up with this picture?