[RicFlair]

You make sense with what you say and I agree, but I think you missed my point. I was comparing Kentucky's best to the best out of the other states with my comment. Out of all of the Florida cities you mentioned, Jacksonville is the only one with a higher population than Louisville. You can have that argument with the mountain schools as far as population and comparing to other states, but not with Louisville schools. On a national scale, we have to rely on our Louisville schools. Like you say, they're that good in comparison based on the population. Let's be honest, Trinity and Male would be the only two schools in this state to even be considered as being able to compete with some of the other top schools nationally this year. (I'm talking at the highest level. Not Mayfield's level.) Where we have 2 teams good enough, others have 10 and that is based off population.

I'm not talking about cities, I'm talking about states as a whole, Louisville is really all we have. Again, comparing state population it's not really even close, you can look at this on a large scale (nationally) or a small scale (state) football is a numbers game no matter if you're talking from school to school or state to state. Kentucky population is 4.14 million. Florida is 19.89 million, that's 15 million more people, that's A LOT more people and a lot more chances for better players. It's just like a Louisville school compared to a mountain school. It's just numbers and it's not a fair comparison no matter how you look at it.