[KYHSFBFan]

I don't think anyone advocates anything based on records, I know I wasn't. I believe that quality wins should be taken into account and a loss, regardless of who it is too is a loss and should not outweigh a solid win. Does a loss to a good team outweigh a quality win? Hart Co shutout Ballard and have no love at all. Lex Cath still considered a top 5 team because they lost to Johnson Central and Ryle? Yes they may contend in the West LATER in the year but currently they are 1 - 2. I am just not a fan of the quality loss idea. Maybe I just like to over analyze when I am bored.

Lawrence Co fell out of the top 10, their only loss is to Montgomery Co - whose only loss is to Collins in a tight game and who has received votes for the top 10 in 5A. At this point they are more deserving of Top 10 than Lex Cath, Bell or Central. Yes I know both Lex Cath and Central will compete in the playoffs most likely, but a top 10 should be based on current metrics and not how we think things will shake out.

Corbin is 3-0 and I think most people agree #3 is a bit high based on competition played and performance against said competition. Heck I wouldn't even rank Bell top 10 at this point because their wins are against very weak competition and their loss to Boyle was decisive.

Man, you're killing me here. Got to step in and say this. Nothing personal, but, 1) Hart Co's win vs Ballard was a very, very average win. Ballard's most likely in the lower tier of 2a. 2) Lawrence Co deserves to be over Lex Cath/Central? What? Are you serious? Is it strickly because they have a 2-1 record and the other 2 have a 1-2 record? Lawrence would be run clocked by Ryle, Johnson Central, CAL or Manual. All 4 would run clock them. Not buying that one, but,I may give you the benefit of the doubt on Bell Co. 3) Now you say Bell doesn't even belong because they beat weak competition and got beat by a big margin to the #1 team in the class. Weren't you just defending Hart Co and their weak schedule? 4) You also acknowledge Corbin at 3-0 is probably rated too high, however, based on what else you've said in here, if we go by the matrix, you can't get any better than 3-0, right, so, why shouldn't they be #3, since Lex Cath, Central and PT, the 3 teams right behind them all have 1-2 records?