[dflpackage]

The above is an example of what watching too many Law and Order episodes can do to an obviously inferior mind. First, poor dflpackage is confusing 'slander' and 'libel'. Next, he throws in "defamatory" to attempt to look knowledgeable. On the other hand, he did spell "pro bono" correctly. All in all, dflpackage needs to go back to his cartoons. The real world is far over his "pay grade".

There are additional errors, Memo. Technically, one should italicize "pro bono." if you notice, I also incorrectly used the word "if" instead of the word "of." Finally, i don't want my imprecise discussion of slander vs libel, which fall under the general umbrella of defamation ( we will leave for a different day any more nuanced discussion of the differentiation between "per se" and "per quod") to in any way reflect poorly on Law and Order or its legion of faithful fans. Alas, the post to which my post referenced is no more, but cleverly trolled by another footballnut. Presumably, it is a pay grade issue. ( which, I am sorry to say should not be italicized.)

I'm going with Ashland 34-Raceland 14. I like Raceland's OGs a bunch. Davidson is a good athlete. In the two-back set, I think R's running backs do a great job lead blocking. I worry that Davidson will not have enough time to get the ball off in the spread formations. Ashland has some speed on its defense this year. The new look defense should be significantly better than last year. I think it will have more of the flavor that it had in the Highlands game. If R's defense over-pursues like it did against WC, I think it will result in a bunch of Ashland points scored by Baker. In any event, good luck to both teams. I'm hopeful that everyone stays healthy. Memo, safe travels if you are making the "trip."