[TheRealThing]

They are right there in the verse I quoted. The bolded ones don't deal withnsexuvl perversion. The point about Lot is that god is ok with him turning his daughters over to be raped, as long as he saves the men from being raped?


Behold, this was the [B]guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy.[/B]



So, back to the point. Is homosexuality the only sin you are comfortable with restaurant owners discriminating against patrons. Would gluttony be a good reason for an owner not wanting to contribute to the patrons sin for religious reasons? Are the other abominations good reasons for an owner to be able to discriminate?

Decided to crop that bolded quote to drop the bothersome abomination word out huh? Anytime God calls a people Sodom, or calls them sister Sodom, they are headed for the fires of Hell. God destroyed Sodom with fire for sexual sins. And this is just a reference to that while pointing out that those He is addressing can expect the same one day. The restaurant owners of Walkerton did not discriminate against anybody. They never denied anybody service, their only trespass was to answer a hypothetical question. But, just like you or anybody else would not rationally force a Muslim tee shirt shop to make a shirt captioned "Jesus is Lord", which He is BTW, forcing the Christian owner of a pizza shop to cater a gay wedding is equally ridiculous.