[Jamesjam]

That's your argument, you're just looking for a fair playing field? Everyone is offered the same opportunities it doesn't get much more fair than that. So what you're saying is if a child is held back for academic reasons he should have to play up a level. What if he can barely compete at his grade level he is at? Should the kids not be afforded the opportunity to grow and excell in all areas? Or is this topic about the same things it's always been about, egos. Mommy and daddy want the best athlete possible so they hold their kid back hoping he receives numerous accolades. While other parents sit back whine and cry because their baby can't compete with a kid a year older than them and they shouldn't have to anyway. High levels of competition breeds a competive drive and improve skills so why complain that they have to play against better players. I agree that kids should play up a level if their abilities allow it, but some schools don't allow kids to play up grade levels. Like I said everyone has the same opportunity their is no right or wrong. Do what you think is best, but don't sit back and cry like my 3 year old when it doesn't go the way you hoped it would. If you lose you work that much harder in the offseason, not pout until next season. Rant over...

quit making excuses for holding kids back that CAN'T compete with kids their own age.