[This is me]

Thats what is so great about our personel on defense. Young, Messer, Dixon, and The other DBs all cover so much ground that we dont have to worry about one imparticular matchup on recievers. Our LBs do a great job in coverage as well. We dealt with the three headed attack of Long, Baker , and Prince from Ashland and did a good enough job to win the game. It was our inexperience upfront and Ashlands depth upfront that caused our issues in the 2nd and 3rd quarter. We have developed that depth issue a great deal. Paintsville doesnt have the line or depth that Ashland did.

I think our primary concern will be getting pressure in the backfield. Be it against the run or pass. Our advantage will be upfront. We arent going to outsize anyone for the most part, but we will be quicker and stronger upfront. So i guess to answer the question is we wont be "keying" on one player alone. The primary goal will be disrupting the timing by getting pressure up front and Sorcing them to become one demensional. Which imo, will be taking away the passing game and forcing them to rely on the run. They have a great backfield, but w/o the presence of a dominate or consistant offensive line, that is almost negated in ways. I think Paintsville will put up some numbers, simply because they are more balanced than most of the teams we have played. But it will all be between the 30s and from a big gain or so by Hendricks. It will boil down to who can keep their offense on the field the longest, with thag said, I think our defense is several steps ahead of theirs. Not really a weak point. If Paintsville had a line like Coal Grove, Ashland, or even Lawrence Co, I think they would pose a threat, but they dont. Again, I dont want to belittle or take anything away from the growth and improvements that Chirico and co have made , just stating why I feel Raceland wins.

Seems like the game plans in order..