[baseball1974]

Yeah, I would like to hear the answer to that. Good post, double gg.

From the film I got to see(wasn't great quality) it looked like a situation of one team having a game plan and executing it against a team that was unprepared for anything that was thrown at them? Just my opinion, but I seen good athletes on both sides of the field. Raceland's defensive backfield seemed much more on-point, but both squads had as much talent as the other. I think last year's Raceland squad might have been more talented than this years?

When you generally have two teams that are similar, the game is won from the work the coaches and players put into game film. Studying your opponents and finding ways to exploit their weaknesses is how games are won. Going through hours of the opponents game film and getting to a point where your defense knows every formation, motions, and what plays on what downage is how your defense gains confidence. They know their ready for anything that's thrown at them because they feel like they know their opponent better than they know themselves. How well coaches are at this is usually what separates dominant programs from teams that flair up every so often. Relying on talent will only get you so far and you will only be successful when that talent comes. However, if you know you're the smartest team on the field every week then you start to build dominance year after year. Knowing how to highlight your strengths and knowing how to exploit weaknesses is how coaches gain longevity.