[TheRealThing]

^ The point was, you guys elected a senator with no more experience than her, yet you bitch about her experience. Hypocrite much?

Exaggerate much? I can't speak for everybody else on here but, I can tell you this, I don't agree with you. Alison is a novice by any standard. A hand picked 2nd choice of a yes girl for the DNC and Obama in particular. Dems are petrified by the fear that McConnell will win, and they're even more afraid control of the Senate may well boil down to one seat, his seat. Mitch has a nice lead and if the numbers were reversed you'd be feeling pretty confident. Liberal Camelot could be preserved if the unthinkable happens and Mitch is unseated. And the dutiful if shallow Harry Reid, could continue on in his role as Captain Gridlock.

The coming choice is clear, another vacuous though rabid liberal chipmunk entering high office, or stick with a not so perfect yet vastly experienced and much feared legislator, who has shown himself to be one of the few with the guts to stand up against liberalism. Nobody's perfect, but Mitch's resume reads like who's who from among the current list of high profile Congressional leaders, much less miss Alison. Comparing Alison's qualifications to Mitch, is like comparing a Little Leaguer to Babe Ruth, it cannot be done. And after all, we're not electing Rand Paul, who has acquitted himself quite handily BTW, nor do such abstract comparisons serve any real purpose other than to take away focus from the patently obvious. Alison by comparison to the one she's running against, is unqualified on the basis of her own resume to be a serious contender to replace the sitting Minority Leader of the US Senate. Especially since said Minority Leader happens to be our own state Senator. Therefore, replacing him with a freshman no name would be mindless and I don't believe it will be forthcoming. Not this time.