[Stardust]

Brock has to win, or else him defeating "The Streak" would be worthless.

How is that logical? So does that mean that Brock should never ever lose again?

I agree, that Roman Reigns will get the rub because the WWE will make sure you the fan recognizes how "GREAT" the accomplishment is that Roman beat the man who beat THE DEADMAN. But, Roman will lose to someone, and do you think that the WWE will make a big deal about someone beat the man who beat the man, who beat the deadman?????

It's logical what the WWE is trying to accomplish here. But the fact that Brock, a part time wrestler is the guy who the WWE decided to put over made zero sense. I contend that if the WWE wanted Roman to get the rub, then it should have been done at WM. I've said it all along, Roman speared Undertaker in the summer of 2013. Undertaker never was seen again until WM. Thus, that would have been the logical storyline. But mixing Brock, who has been gone since WM to now become the transitional champion takes something away from what could have been. Bottom-line, more people would have gotten a bigger charge out of Roman beating taker, than Roman beating Brock, who beat Taker!