[Stardust]

- Limit the PPV's to no more than 5 a year.
(Royal Rumble, WM, SummerSlam, Survivor Series and bring back an old WCW/NWA event title)

I don't have an issue with the WWE having a PPV 12 times per year. I don't think TNA can get by with it, but if they incorporated many of your points below, then yes, you can create enough storylines to support 12 PPV's. During the Attitude era and NWO era, fans were buying 24 PPV's per year, and felt like they missed something big if they didn't watch it. I had no interest in RR this year, because I knew the results before the PPV even went on the air.


- Use current events to build story lines.
(Hulk Hogan vs. Sgt. Slaughter at WM 7)

In today's Political correctness, you can't book like this anymore. I remember watching wrestling in the 70's and the white wrestlers called the black wrestlers "Boy". You can't racially or ethnically book wrestling anymore because you will have 100's of protesters outside your doors.

- Let a heel be a heel and a face be a face.
(It's hard to believe a character that turns feel/face or face/heel 3 times in a year)

[COLOR="red"]This I believe and have supported for the last several years. I like the "tweener" role, but I do not like the flip-flop characters. It makes no sense, and it only confuses fans. There is no logic behind turning guys back and forth. The biggest difference in the writers of today, versus the bookers of yesterday is that writers want to write like its a 12 episode TV drama, where the charecters change each week. Wrestling does not succeed with that type of booking.

Actually, there are no bookers anymore. Bookers were wrestling guys. They knew the business, they booked based on the emotions given by the fans to a character, and they went with it until the fans changed their interest. Today, writers write out a 3 month block, the the wrestlers are scripted with what they say and do in the ring. Writers do not "know" the business. Bring back the "Booker".[/COLOR]


- Bring back the jobber/squash matches

YES, YES, YES! This I agree with whole-heartedly. Look what it did for Ryback! We do not need to see a marqee match-up EVERY match. Build a guy up, and make him interesting. Let a guy beat up a guy badly, lift his shoulders several times when the ref gets ready to hit "three", and build some hate!

- There are no Monster heels or Baby faces

Again, you are spot on! Wrestlers are 6-5 270 steroid freaks, or 5-8 Jumping Jack stunt men. Give me Typhoon, Bam Bam Bigelow, and Big Van Vader!

- The WWE needs some real competition similar to the Monday Night War.
(IMO, TNA will always be second fiddle to the WWE)

And this one is the BIGGEST issue of all. If I were Vince, I would HELP TNA. Without TNA being a threat, WWE will continue to give us the crap that you outlined above.