[PHSForever]

You may be right. I looked at it like this. They both lost 2 games. I felt Hazard played a little better schedule. They played W'Burg a lot closer than Raceland did, who beat Pikeville. They had a very solid win against Somerset and there loss to Pikeville was a very close game, as was there loss to Fairview, who I felt they outplayed but shot themselves in the foot the whole game. They doubled them in yardage. At the end of the year, I felt they were playing better ball.

Pikeville played Middlesboro, Prestonsburg, Russell, Hazard, Belfry. Hazard had Breathitt, Prestonsburg, Somerset, Fairview. Fairly even, really. And don't let the final score fool you, Pikeville dominated that game against Hazard. Hazard scored twice on recovered onside kicks in the final 4 minutes to make it appear closer. At one point it was 56-21. I was actually there, so I know, I'm not relying on final scores. And Pikeville put 70 on Middlesboro, scored 20 against Belfry (only 4 other teams did that all year), etc. Like I said, picked a bad time to lay an egg/have a bad game (against Raceland). Not taking anything away from Hazard or Raceland, I just feel there is no way when you look at ALL of the information, you can say Hazard should be ranked 3 spots ahead of a team that dominated them. All the teams are deserving in your rankings, just the order is a little out of wack with actual results. And actually, Hazard lost 3 games. Fairview beat them, it was changed to a forfeit later.