[blazeburnin]

^^ Your first example shows a player stumbling on the side line into the opposing player. Good no call.

Your second example doesn't even show what call the official made. I would assume it was an unsportsmanlike conduct on the team in white. We do not know what was said on the field so how can we dispute it.

I assume you are talking about the "bump". That is what was called. He didn't say anything. It was for "contact with an official".

Congrats to Bowling Green on the win. Good luck in the playoffs.

I will say if the way the Blackman team entered the field is any indication of how they acted on the field I could see all the unsportsmanlike conduct flags. Why run down across the 50 into the opposing team? You are just asking for trouble. Looks like the Purple was above that, so nothing transpired.

Because that is what they are used to. Why does BG have to come onto the field towards the visitors sideline? Blackman is used to running onto the field through a tunnel of students (usually 100 yards long). BG's funky set up caused them to run onto the field on the opposite side. Ideally, they would have run down the other hash/numbers, but that would have run directly into the Purples.

The no call on the hit out of bounds wasn't a bad call IMO. You could have called that, but it wasn't blatant or on purpose by the second defender.

The flag on the TE bumping into the ref was a terrible call though.

Not sure on all the unsportmanlike calls. Can't really tell what's going on when 22 players are bunched together.

If it would have been one player, maybe I could have seen your argument. If Blackman wouldn't have been called for at least 2 that were basically the same, except for being just 1 player...i would understand it. However, he was hit the first time, that spun him around, then the second guy comes in and pulls him down. Whether intentional or not, it HAS to be called. If you swallow your whistle there, you have to swallow your whistle completely...which obviously they didn't.