[LOOKAYANNER]

First bold.....inaccuracies and misinformation according to whom?
Second bold.....CBS/Dan Rather and ABC/Peter Jennings are the measuring stick for credibility?????
Third bold.....credible and media are two words that should never be used in the same sentence, IMO
Fourth bold.....They strive for major news?? I don't agree. They strive for popularity, political correctness and making money more so than even the History Channel.

I understand what you're saying about the news media, and I agree, it has certainly changed over the last couple of decades. But still, it would be the biggest news story on any of the major news networks if they could be the first to prove without a doubt that there was a conspiracy to assassinate the President. It would be the lead news story on every news program for weeks. They've covered all the bases and they can't do it. So they move on to the next most logical choice, that there was not a conspiracy. Oswald acted alone that day. He had the opportunity because he worked in a building that the motorcade was going to be passing by, and he seized the moment to commit his terrible crime. All the evidence suggest that he did it. His finger prints were on the gun and the snipers nest of boxes. The brown paper wrapping found in the room with the gun on the sixth floor match the brown paper that the boy who drove Oswald to work that morning said he saw wrapped around what Oswald said was curtain rods. Laser test from the sixth floor prove that the shots that struck Kennedy and Connelly trace directly from that floor to where they struck their targets. Oswald was missing from the building after the murder. I could go on and on. But all the lead investigators conclude that Oswald acted alone and that the Warren Commission got it right. Oswald was the only one who knew his plans on that fateful day.
Bugliosi's book took 1,600 pages but it covered every detail, including debunking all the conspiracy theories. It's a long but excellent read.