[TheRealVille]

:biglmao: As I was typing out my post, I wondered how you would manage to reduce it's substance to some obscure minutia you would feel comfortable attacking. I said the original [B]prosecutor wouldn't indict Zimmerman.[/B] In fact, the thing never even went to a grand jury. And so, the governor brought in Angela Corey to replace the uncooperative Norm Wolfinger. The Sheriff did investigate the matter and would not charge Zimmerman. The police chief was the one who got canned, but a lot of arm twisting went on to get the council votes needed for a simple majority to run him off, not to mention all the protesting and complaints that erupted by the townsfolk.

This is the only way you can respond to logic, pour over a post and find any little detail to haggle about. Heads rolled, and in spite of the left's best punches, justice prevailed.


PS --- "Wolfinger was criticized for making the decision that there was insufficient evidence for a conviction of George Zimmerman on the charge of manslaughter. Wolfinger has expressed surprise at the national spotlight and the reaction to his decision. Zimmerman was found not guilty after being tried by another prosecutor in a state court." [Wiki]

No you didn't. Again, get your facts straight.

And, the last point you continue to ignore is that the Sheriff's department ruled it self defense and refused to charge Zimmerman for any crime whatever. All of which led to the eventual dismissal of him and the prosecutor, who refused to charge Zimmerman for the same reasons. -